There is a thought experiment with a train. The train is rushing at speed and is about to hit five people tied to the rails. However, if you switch the lever to other rails, the train will only kill one person tied to them.
You switch the lever? Almost all of you will answer yes. Now the same situation, only you need to push it onto the rails fat man. His mass will stop the train, but he will die. Most of you will say push fat man they won’t. In both cases we sacrifice one for the sake of five/six people. This thought experiment raises the question of moral choice and what is more important in it – thought or result. Since consequences are the end point of an event, it is more important result, say utilitarians. From the point of view of utilitarianism, in both cases we save the majority by sacrificing the minority. Morally, the right decision is the one that maximizes people’s well-being. However, from a classical moral point of view, deciding who lives and who dies is an impermissible choice. It does not cancel the inaction in the first case, because in any case the train will be to blame for the death of people, not you. Your guilt will be purely indirect. Guilt for the death of a person it will be like being on a train. push fat man under the train will make this action more personal. But inaction is not an option. Even in criminal law, sometimes inaction is tantamount to a crime. Thomas Aquinas believed that if you strangled a child in a bathtub or saw a child drowning in it and did nothing, then the guilt in both cases will be on your hands and will be equal to each other. And then everyone has the following question:
There is no definite answer to this question, because it has been hanging in the air for half a century. This experiment was invented in 1967 by the English philosopher Philippa Foot.
She developed this question in the field of ethics and it has found its application in cognitive science and neuroethics.
So, what kind of animals are these:
Cognitive science is a scientific direction that studies mental and cognitive processes, and also deals with modeling the principles of organization and functioning of various natural and artificial systems. Roughly speaking, a scientific approach to thought processes.
Neuroethics there is an area of research on brain activity at the time of making moral decisions, to put it simply.
Now let’s look at it sight both of these fields of science on the “trolley problem”:
From the point of view cognitive science regardless of countries, cultures and religions, the decisions of all people this issue approximately the same.
From the point of view neuroethics British scientists found that using fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) in their experiments, people’s answers to questions asked in the original formulation and in the formulation with a “fat person” were analyzed. The scientists’ hypothesis was that solving these problems would cause both emotional and cognitive reactions, and that there would be a conflict between them.
Here, FINALLY, we come to Prey
At the very beginning of the game you go through a series of tests, at the end of which you are shown several questions, including the trolley problem. I will immediately connect the questions in the test with practice in the game and you will immediately understand everything.
FIRST QUESTION
The answer to this https://olgcasino.co.uk/withdrawal/ question will immediately show how you intend to play Prey and how you will play Prey. If you answered the same thing, then most likely you completed the game as you’re more used to it, because you just answered to this question. Are you ready for something new, or will you do things the old fashioned way?. Don’t take it personally, the answer "Old place" doesn’t mean you’ll play through the game like a fool. This means that you will go through it like this, How do you get through other games?. For example, in first-person games I rarely look under tables or ceilings, and in Prey, of course, I didn’t do this, but I should have. If you answer “new” you will play in a new way, taking mechanics and game design of Prey, adjusting under her rules.
The game showed you your answer to this question through gameplay.
SECOND QUESTION
No one dares to execute me, not even myself. No matter how experienced a player you are, you will begin to believe in the world of the game after an hour or two of playing. Games are created for this purpose, to convey emotions to you in the situation played out in the game.
We play as the moral bastard Morgan Yu. He did not feel sorry for the people who were forced to take part in deadly experiments. If you fulfilled the request of Ekaterina Ilyushina to search for information about her father, then you understand what kind of person we are talking about. Morgan Yu is cold-blooded and cruel. He justifies his cruelty with science, but this does not negate his actions. The ends can never justify the means, at least for me.
However, the person we play as at the beginning of the game is my avatar, not Morgan Yu. Dummy without memory, body.
And Morgan Yu tells me that I must die. The first time I responded the same way as I did in the test. Nobody tells me that I have to die, this is the instinct of self-preservation and a bunch of other factors. Surely you responded the same way as you answered in the test.
The game showed you your answer to this question through gameplay.
THIRD QUESTION
And also FOURTH AND FIFTH
Okay, you read them. You immediately recognized them as the “trolley problem” and already understand what I’m getting at. The whole game is one big illustration of this experiment in “practice”.
The game played us like a damn fiddle!
Your answer perfectly shows your actions throughout the game’s plot. For me personally, yes, everything coincided, one to one. If you turn the switch, and you most likely will, then you will not end the game in an escape capsule or in a comfortable shuttle. Whether the shuttle will be staffed or not depends on how you answered the question with the fat man. If, to my surprise, you are really ready to sacrifice yourself for the sake of the people tied to the trolley, then most likely you will destroy the station with yourself, but not the staff. Well, if you killed Alex, then fair enough, yes, he’s an asshole.
CONCLUSION this is – the context in which the “trolley problem” is played out in Prey is too complex and the question cannot be resolved outside of abstraction due to a huge number of factors and our biased attitude towards the participants in the experiment. Either five people or all of humanity may be at stake. However, from the notes scattered throughout the game, it is clear that something is wrong with humanity. I’m not saying that everything is fine with our family now, but nevertheless. Is the minority worth the majority?? A majority that allowed a minority to endanger people. Guilty people, every now and then. Does Transtar have the right to decide people’s destinies, no matter how bad the person is from a moral point of view?? The same father of Ilyushina saved people from the Soviet Union, and did not trade in slaves. Life is a complicated thing and in the abstract it, of course, looks simpler. Everyone has their own answer and everyone will be right to some extent. Whether the employees should live or die, whether to save the station or not, whether to save Morgan or not, these are too difficult questions from different points of view.
OKAY, THERE WILL BE SPOILERS, BEWARE.
But in general it’s not so critical if you understand what the whole game is about.
At the end it turns out that you are not Morgan Yu, but only a mimic with his memories. Many, even me at first, perceived this as a lazy end to a talented work. However, this shows the player as the object of that same thought experiment.
The test at the beginning is the whole Prey
Another CONCLUSION:
Prey is a work about our brain and our behavior. Prey is a work about how complex life is, how much the context influences the result and how our brains argue with themselves. It’s about whether humanity is worth itself. That’s why I put it on par with Bioshock, this will be in the history books. Let me take my leave, peace to your home! The fifth page in Word is coming, it’s already difficult for me to double-check the text myself, I don’t envy you guys at all, bye everyone.
